Tooele wins battle in Overlake legal war
by Tim Gillie
Jun 08, 2010 | 5113 views | 5 5 comments | 62 62 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Judge throws out $20.7 million judgment against city by declaring a mistrial

A jury verdict that ordered Tooele City to pay $20.7 million in damages to the developer of Overlake has been thrown out by the judge that originally presided over the case.

On Thursday, 3rd District Court Judge Randall Skanchy declared a mistrial in the Tooele Associates vs. Tooele City lawsuit, saying in a 47-page memorandum decision that the verdict reached by a Salt Lake City jury last year was “irreconcilably inconsistent.”

Although the jury returned a verdict in the case, the case was not settled until the judge rendered a judgment. Skanchy issued his decision after reviewing motions filed by both parties after the trial and hearing oral arguments from attorneys on both sides.

Skanchy’s decision effectively resets a lawsuit that has been hanging over the city’s head for a decade.

“The case is back in the status it was in prior to the 2009 jury trial,” said Tooele City Attorney Roger Baker. “Despite the expense of the 2009 jury trial, Tooele City is pleased that the court recognized, as the city has always recognized, that the $20 million jury verdict in favor of Tooele Associates was wrong and should not be allowed to stand. Tooele City is prepared to retry the case to again present its evidence that Tooele Associates, not Tooele City, breached the development agreement. The city’s course of action, however, will largely depend on how Tooele Associates chooses to proceed in the case. We anticipate that a new trial would be held sometime in 2011.”

The original suit was filed in 2002 by Tooele Associates alleging that Tooele City had violated the Overlake development agreement and intentionally slowed down progress at Overlake effectively ending construction. Tooele City countered by claiming that Tooele Associates had violated the development agreement by failing to complete required infrastructure.

In June 2009, after six days of trial and two days of deliberation, an eight member jury returned a verdict that found Tooele Associates owed Tooele City $1.8 million in damages, but that also found Tooele City owed Tooele Associates $22.5 million. The difference left Tooele owing $20.7 million.

The jury verdict was in the form of a six-page special verdict form containing 33 questions that the jury checked either yes or no.

In a post-trial memorandum filed in February 2010, Tooele City pointed out several contradictions and inconsistencies in the answers on the special verdict form. Skanchy went through 28 pages of his decision trying to reconcile the contradictions. Skanchy tried to develop a decision that would reconcile such differences as why the jury in section I of the verdict form stated that Tooele City had failed to prove that Tooele Associates had breached the development agreement and then in section II they stated that Tooele City had proved that Tooele Associates breached the agreement. When Skanchy was unable to reconcile this and other internal inconsistencies within the verdict form, he struck the jury verdict and declared a mistrial.

“We are still reviewing the decision and awaiting other decisions from the court,” said Bruce Baird, a Salt Lake-based attorney representing Tooele Associates.

Tim Gillie: tgillie@tooeletranscript.com

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Logical_American_Vet
|
June 30, 2010
To LovinLife -

Let us get this straight; you are comparing a very conservative group of city government officials, with a very conservative agenda to the Obama Administration… how ignorant are you? Incase you haven’t noticed, the current Administration didn’t receive the country on the greatest terms or in the greatest condition. The previous eight years hindered there chances to succeed. It is apparent, as a republican, that it is time for us to stop blaming the dems/libs when we are NO BETTER! Quit acting like uneducated, immature children and DO SOMETHING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!! In your case, an education would be beneficial.
dutch-guy
|
June 21, 2010
I was on the jury for this. we came to the amount based on the questions. we asked other questions but were told to go from the 33 questions and determine who was at fault.

we all agreed that both sides were at fault but the city used its power to bully the developer to what they wanted after the fact. The judge said that this would be appealed after he released us from jury duty. Glad that I could waste 2 weeks of my time to find out that it didn't mean anything
TooeleVeteran
|
June 15, 2010
All it says is that the jury verdict form had inconsistencies. It doesn't mean that Tooele City won the trial or would win another trial. In fact, the jury obviously felt that the City materially breached the Agreement since the weight of the judgment was $22.5 vs. $1.8 million.

Tooele City needs to humble itself and admit that it has overstepped its bounds. It should just settle all of these ridiculous lawsuits and stop wasting OUR money trying to avoid saying that it messed up. I am so sick of Baker and the fools on the city council.
knip
|
June 10, 2010
Pretty messed up that city council can bribe a judge to throw out a decade old decision that probably ruined multiple peoples lives at the time... Tooele is being run by too many old people stuck in their ways which is ruining this economy and the much needed growth of the valley... But either way they will never win just inevitable ruin more lives till the time comes where they accept what to them was once wrong... Hmmm SOUND FAMILIAR UTAH??
LovinLife
|
June 09, 2010
This just goes to show all how deep the corruption runs in Tooele politics. It’s almost like the Obama administration is running Tooele.
report abuse...

Comments will be posted after review. Please allow up to 24 hours for comment approval.

Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Tooele Transcript-Bulletin. Abusive comments and users are subject to rejection or removal without notification.

We will reject and remove comments that contain any of the following: Potentially libelous statements; personal attacks, insults or threats; profanity or obscene references; copyrighted articles or information used without permission; promotional messages of a commercial nature; links to other Web sites; comments unrelated to the topic of the article.

By posting a comment, you are agreeing to abide by these guidelines. Violation of these guidelines may result in a user being barred from posting on the Web site.

Online Edition
Shadowbox Test Site

THIS WEEK'S ADS

QUALITY AUTOMOTIVE
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



RITZ THEATRES
To Flash Zoom Click HERE



QUALITY AUTOMOTIVE
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



DAVID K. PALMER
To Flash Zoom Click HERE



BIG O TIRES
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



AMERICAN BURGERS
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



MOUNTAIN WEST MEDICAL CENTER
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



TRANSCRIPT BULLETIN PUBLISHING
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website