EPA has no business regulating air quality
by Matt Rowley
Jan 19, 2010 | 1535 views | 3 3 comments | 24 24 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Perhaps I should be humbled an institution with the EPA’s size and power still has time to micromanage our local air. The federal entity has taken on a certain likeness to deity in recent years, most recently declaring they can regulate carbon dioxide levels sans Congress. This past fall, the EPA descended from on high to inform residents of the Tooele Valley that we’re on their hit list as an area that doesn’t meet federal standards for fine-particle matter pollution. We’ve got three years to clean up our emissions — or else.

Well, the EPA isn’t deity yet. As it turns out, Tooele Valley’s air is well within federal limits. With a broad stroke of typical bureaucratic recklessness, the feds have simply lumped our air in with emissions from Salt Lake. Thankfully the EPA’s non-attainment designation is being challenged. Kudos to state and local representatives for petitioning against this nonsense.

The situation raises questions, not the least of which is why our air quality has been counted with Salt Lake’s in the face of data indicating we have much better air quality. But there are deeper implications. For starters, might not local residents have a better grasp on their air quality than national bureaucrats? Is it possible the EPA has their federal fingers in too many pies to ensure fair and effective regulation? Finally, might the current circumstances indicate the EPA has stretched well beyond appropriate federal boundaries?

I say yes on all accounts. The feds are always welcome to drop in and sniff our air, but they have no business regulating it. Furthermore, if the EPA’s assessment had been correct, they would have no business regulating our air anyway. Why? Don’t I value our air quality? To the contrary, I care far more than anyone in Washington because I’m the one breathing it.

Everybody wants clean, healthy air, and regulations clearly need to be in place. But there is no place for federal regulating of air quality, because situations and solutions are unique to their localities. Utah Valley has to deal with geographically-caused inversions. Salt Lake County has massive vehicle emissions to account for. And Tooele Valley, well our sin appears to be living too close to Salt Lake. In all cases, meeting the tightening standards of this heedless, lumbering bureaucracy means cuts to local economies and more spending of taxpayer dollars.

There is a viable alternative to the feds’ clumsy cookie-cutter regulating: the state. The United States is formed of several distinct governing bodies like Utah. Not only does this system form a bulwark against over-centralized power, it allows for a diverse, dynamic governing body to meet the varied needs of the Republic.

I’m no political genius, but the founding fathers may have been on to something. Let Utah regulate its own emissions and base policy on informed representation from local communities. That way, the Utah Department of Environmental Quality can spend more time fighting air pollution instead of petitioning against harmful edicts from the misinformed in Washington.

Municipal bodies generally have a more vested interest in their communities than top-down government workers who’ve never seen postcards of the towns they’re regulating. Air quality is no exception. The EPA should get their tentacles out of Tooele Valley and focus on things closer to home. How’s the air quality in D.C. this time of year?

Matt Rowley is a teacher at Copper Canyon Elementary who lives in Tooele.
Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
hanzinator
|
January 25, 2010
Hey there Firebear, thanks for the response. I especially enjoyed your clever inserts of where readers are supposed to chuckle throughout your response [sarcasm]. I thought I would clear up a couple of the points that you appear to be unable to understand in my comment. “...(chuckle) have you read the Transcript this past week. This is a current issue”. I have read the Transcript this past week and the article published 17 months ago by Sarah Miley titled “EPA lumps Tooele Valley into dirty-air zone”. My thinking Firebear is that we have been over this so many times it seems “so last year”, a term commonly employed by youngsters to denote something that is outdated. Thanks for asking. By the way, “...(chuckle) have you read the Transcript this past week.” is in the form of a question. Typically, one would use a question mark and not a period. To clear up your second comment, “nowhere in the author's article does it say anything blaming SLC for our (Tooele) air quality”. I guess this quote from your opinion piece “our sin appears to be living too close to Salt Lake” means something else and can be interpreted countless ways. I apologize for my gross misinterpretation of your comment. Your third point where you agree with my comment and then get me back on track to understanding your “whole other argument” was brilliant. I especially enjoyed the capitalized word “FACT” to reel me back in from not comprehending the intent of your article. Thanks a lot. Let’s tackle the fourth point “you make it seem that our local and state government is in some type of conspiracy by wanting everyone to believe…” and I would like to answer that with your original comment “I believe you are taking liberties of putting words in the author's article that really isn't there”. Thanks kettle, I would have struggled for some time looking for the appropriate response. As far as numbers go, I don’t have any and never stated that I did. It reminds of the comment “I believe you are taking liberties of putting words in the author's article that really isn't there”. What I said was “when you look at the Tooele Valley, we exceed air quality standards”. How do I know this? When the Salt Lake Valley has exceeded levels of air pollution that are considered unhealthy, the Tooele Valley is not far behind. It is a simple matter of diffusion. I assume that is still taught in school. I can only rely on my eyes burning or son wheezing for my numbers due to a lack of monitoring equipment in the Tooele Valley, but to me those are fairly good indicators that our air quality has gone to crap. Just so you know, I don’t need a rain gauge to tell me when it is raining either. What I still haven’t gotten from the article or your response is why it is such a big deal to be considered a part of the Salt Lake Valley Airshed? There are no physical barriers that prevent commingling of the Salt Lake and Tooele Valley air and our community is a significant source of air pollution. Your arguments of I don’t want to and it’s not right are not good enough. You get an A for being obstinate but an overall F for lacking critical thinking.
firebear
|
January 20, 2010
Well, hazinator, you don't seem like a political genius yourself! First, you say that the argument "that our community is somehow separate from the Salt Lake Valley is so last year"...(chuckle) have you read the Transcript this past week. This is a current issue. Second, nowhere in the author's article does it say anything blaming SLC for our (Tooele) air quality. I believe you are taking liberties of putting words in the author's article that really isn't there. Third, "most people have enough sense to understand we are contributing to the overall impacts on air quality in our valley". Duh, but the author isn't arguing that in his opinion article. In FACT, the article actually is stating a whole other argument such as not lumping Tooele's air quality with that of other counties and that the feds having no business regulating Utah air...did you read the same article? Fourth, you make it seem that our local and state government is in some type of conspiracy by wanting everyone to believe that we (the author and the general population here in Tooele) are being duped by not stating the true numbers of Tooele Valley vs. the average from Tooele County. Where do you get your numbers stating specifically that Tooele Valley exceeds air quality...there is no way I can take your word for it. Quite frankly, anyone that doesn't present a clear, convincing argument and insists on using petty, demeaning comments toward the author has no merit with me (or many others that had a good chuckle by your comment). It is also obvious that hanzinator doesn't present "many facts" as he/she claims. I appreciate the author's opinion article as I agree with him that Tooele County or just Tooele Valley shouldn't be lumped with Salt Lake's air. Yes, it isn't Salt Lakes fault as thousands of commuters are traveling from other counties, but the author has a good point in defense of those living here in Tooele County. Oh by the way, I'm a teacher too and hazinator's comments that Utah setting it's standards will leave teacher's out of a job...well, what facts are you using to make such a statement ?
hanzinator
|
January 20, 2010
I agree with Matt, he is no political genius. If he were, he would understand that the reason the EPA is stepping in is due to the fact that the Utah Legislature refuses to take action to address air quality. The argument that our community is somehow separate from the Salt Lake Valley is so last year. Get on board Matt. Just so you know Matt, according to the 2000 census, 45% of the people in Tooele commute to SLC for work. If I had to speculate, I would guess the 2010 census will increase that number. So to blame it on SLC is just childish. My 16 month old has a better sense of responsibility than that. Let’s face it, most people have enough sense to understand we are contributing to the overall impacts on air quality in our valley. I wonder if you even know why you think the EPA got their numbers wrong. My guess is you agree with our state and local representatives who like to average the entire county air quality. Of course an average of the entire county (which is 7000 square miles and 8% of the entire land area of Utah) will be below the standards. The fact is, when you look at the Tooele Valley, we exceed air quality standards. Our government isn’t worried about the people’s needs. It is budget deficits and big businesses that are driving this fight and it’s a load of BS. If it were up to Utah setting its own emission standards, you would be out of a job because most of your students would be at home with breathing problems. Also, I apologize for adding so many facts in my comment. I know this was an opinion piece focused on feelings and misconceptions and do not intend to detract from its original anti-government sentiment.
report abuse...

Comments will be posted after review. Please allow up to 24 hours for comment approval.

Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Tooele Transcript-Bulletin. Abusive comments and users are subject to rejection or removal without notification.

We will reject and remove comments that contain any of the following: Potentially libelous statements; personal attacks, insults or threats; profanity or obscene references; copyrighted articles or information used without permission; promotional messages of a commercial nature; links to other Web sites; comments unrelated to the topic of the article.

By posting a comment, you are agreeing to abide by these guidelines. Violation of these guidelines may result in a user being barred from posting on the Web site.

Online Edition
Shadowbox Test Site

THIS WEEK'S ADS

QUALITY AUTOMOTIVE
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



RITZ THEATRES
To Flash Zoom Click HERE



QUALITY AUTOMOTIVE
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



DAVID K. PALMER
To Flash Zoom Click HERE



BIG O TIRES
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



AMERICAN BURGERS
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



MOUNTAIN WEST MEDICAL CENTER
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



TRANSCRIPT BULLETIN PUBLISHING
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website