Dangerous mines remain in county
by Sarah Miley
Aug 14, 2008 | 1364 views | 19 19 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
State officials cap old shafts, urge curious to keep out

Tooele County’s history is rich with mining. Place names like Ophir, Jacob City and Gold Hill evoke images of days gone by when mining was an economic mainstay and a way of life. But this heritage has also left the county with a legacy of hidden dangers, according to state mining officials.

According to the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining, there are an estimated 17,000 abandoned mines statewide. Hundreds of those are located within Tooele County. Problems start, however, when the lure of those mines attract backcountry recreationalists.

“Tooele County is heavily populated in abandoned mines,” said Jim Springer, spokesman for the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining.

Springer said there are typically two groups of people who go into these mines: those who may stumble onto an old mine while perhaps recreating, and those who may explore old mines as a hobby.

The state’s Abandoned Mine Reclamation Program, which was initiated in 1982, aims to close mines that pose the greatest risk to people who may choose to access them. The state also conducts the ‘stay out and stay alive’ campaign, started in 1985, to educate people about the dangers of an abandoned mine.

Completed reclamation projects in Tooele County include Serviceberry Canyon, Jacob City and another recently finished this spring at Gold Hill, which is south of Wendover.

The Gold Hill project involved closing less than 100 mines. Hundreds more there have not been touched yet, Springer said.

“There are probably more that should be done in that area, but there’s a limited number of mines that can be sealed each year with funds and staff available to do the work,” Springer said. “Usually the Abandoned Mine Reclamation is able to close 200 to 300 mines a year. With 17,000 scattered around the state, you can see it would take a while to get to them all.”

Another project in the Lakeside Mountains is planned to close 33 mine openings, which are mostly on BLM land. Springer said most of these will be backfilled, but a few will be grated.

Funding for these reclamation projects comes from a tax on coal production in the state. The allotment this year, according to Springer, is about $3.5 million.

Mines that are to be sealed are prioritized, for example by public safety hazards. But before any work is done, there’s an evaluation of the site, Springer said.

“The whole area is evaluated in regards to history, endangered species and wildlife,” said Springer, adding the National Historic Preservation Act, state historian, archeologists and the Environmental Protection Agency are all consulted.

“We don’t want to destroy the historical flavor if there’s some history to be preserved there,” Springer said.

Springer said while the division seals mines, private landowners may do additional work, such as removing buildings, because there are liability issues. Entering a mine, whether on private or federal land, is almost always a trespassing violation without the permission of the landowner.

The division’s official position is abandoned mines are unsafe, however, if a landowner willingly accepts liability and lets people go in and explore a mine that’s OK.

“We wish there were more opportunities for enthusiasts to do just that,” he said, adding he knows of four mines in Colorado that are open for exploration on a commercial basis, while there are currently none in Utah.

Specific entries to abandoned mines can be closed several ways. The easiest, Springer said, is to backfill the hole with dirt. That’s usually done in instances where there’s not a lot of history to be maintained at the site. Or, a block, such as a brick wall, can be put up to prevent access. If wildlife is involved — like bats that often live in mines — a bat grate, which looks like a jail cell door, allows bats to come in and out of the mine, while preventing people from getting in.

Springer said working mines can be dangerous — which is why they’re regulated by the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration — but abandoned mines are infinitely more so.

“Support timbers become old and can be rotten, and no longer support the weight of the mine itself,” Springer said. “They can be subject to cave-ins or rocks sluffing off and falling in on you.”

Inside a mine, there is an ardit — a mine opening going horizontally in the mountain — and once inside there can be shafts or winzes, which are guts that go straight down. Sometimes these can be covered by old, rotten boards and some are hundreds of feet deep. There’s also the possibility of bad air.

“Many mines required at one time or another machinery to pump oxygen into them,” Springer said. “It’s possible there’s just bad air in an abandoned mine, no longer any oxygen, and that could overtake you before you noticed. You can black out and suffocate.”

In addition, explorers can run into old explosives, and dynamite that’s been left for many years becomes unstable, Springer said.

“Of course animals can take up residence that may not get along with you,” he said. “Little things like that.”

According to the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining, since the early 1980s, 10 Utahns have died and another two dozen others have been injured while exploring or happening upon these abandoned mines — and Tooele County is not exempt.

On Jan. 13, 1996, Jeremiah Etherington died after falling in a mine near Stockton called the Honorine Mine. Robert Bartholomew was killed in the Thorpe Hills, near Five-Mile Pass, when he drove his ATV into a 50-foot deep mine shaft on Jan. 23, 1999. In 1971, there was a fatality at a Gold Hill mine when a man died from a rock fall. And on Sept. 23, 1989, Joshua Dennis was lost for five days at Hidden Treasure Mine near Stockton and rescued after an intensive search, according to Springer.

Springer said it’s best for people to enjoy the history of the mines at a distance.

“You still get the feel and historical flavor without actually entering the mine,” he said. “It’s best to enjoy the area that way. If you come across an old mine, we’d be happy to hear about it.”

Sarah Miley: swest@tooeletranscript.com
comments (19)
« divingbuddy wrote on Monday, Jan 19 at 01:11 AM »
Where are all the archeologist reports as to the historical significance determining the historical value of each and every hole in the ground before it is covered with a backhoe or bulldozer? We might as well start bulldozing every building in downtown Tooele and Newtown because they are all a safety hazards and don't posses any local Historical value either.
« Gold_Rush_Expeditions wrote on Monday, Aug 25 at 02:29 PM »
As an FYI, before there is too much Miley bashing, I did chat with her at legnth on Friday, hopefully it will turn into another article that is a little more balanced. She seemed open minded and just didnt know the other side. Jim Springer, who is very aware of GRE and other anti closure groups, told her there was no opposition. Strange since their last assessment in Kanab listed GRE by name as an activist group opposed to their actions.

As to mine visitation... heres a good way to get a stat.. how many people have 4 wheelers? How many people go out and hunt? Take that number, and you probably have a good estimation of those who visit mines, I have NEVER come across a hunter or 4wd driver who have not seen or explored a mine, its part of the allure that this state holds for those who venture out.

If you want a better #, add most 4wd enthusiasts, hikers, mountain bikers, etc...

« Skylinerider wrote on Saturday, Aug 23 at 07:21 AM »
I would love to know how my assertion that statistically speaking, exploring mines is very safe is wrong? yes I know a much smaller percentage of people explore abanded mines, but the numbers are not there to prove it is as dangerous as the DOGM would lead people to believe.

Yes Miley is pandering to the DOGM. She has only given one side of this story, I do not see any interviews to any other experts on the subject. Many exist that would certainly and freely give an interview on the subject.

I actually do know a lot about journalism. And I know when someone has been handed a press release, and makes a story on it. Just because I don't write for the Transcript doesn't mean I haven't been published in other venues.
« oldtimer wrote on Friday, Aug 22 at 04:50 PM »
bubatl said:

"Mine exploring is done by a much smaller number of people. Rather than compare actual numbers of accidents/deaths/injuries, compare the percentages of their frequency of occurance based on the number of participants. Now, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I believe you will find Skylinerider's comment to be woefully overwrought."

Unfortunately calculating a percentage of frequency of occurrence is impossible due to fact that Mine Explorers choose to remain anonymous and do not often admit to the fact that they explore mines. Now I do consider myself a recognized authority on mine exploration and I find the statistics to be approximately .19 deaths per year in the state of Utah loosely or directly associated with abandoned mines. Now Skylinerider's statement may be overwrought, but with a little research you will find that the following statement is equally overwrought.

"10 Utahns have died and another two dozen others have been injured while exploring or happening upon these abandoned mines"

In all my years of research concerning mines in Utah I cannot find 10 deaths and two dozen injuries related to abandoned mines. Some of these "abandoned mine" deaths cited in the statistic have actually occurred in active mines.

bubatl also said:

"Miley does not present what she states as factual, innarguable information. Rather she presents it as information given to her by a representative of DOGM, a "recognized" authority."

I would suggest, politely of course, that you research other DOGM sponsored abandoned mine articles that have been published over the past ten years. I am afraid that you will find that nearly all of them are painfully similar to Miley's.

« bubatl wrote on Thursday, Aug 21 at 02:21 PM »
Skylinerider said: "Statistically, exploring abandoned mines is about the safest outdoor experience there is."

lexploremines gave a bunch of examples of people injured in other activities.

Your statements are problematic for multiple reasons, of which I will explain two:

1. You have to be careful how you interpret statistics, which means you have to know how the data work and how they can be twisted to communicate a particular view. Let's take the examples given in this thread for a case in point. All of the activities lexploreMines mentions are done by large numbers of people. Mine exploring is done by a much smaller number of people. Rather than compare actual numbers of accidents/deaths/injuries, compare the percentages of their frequency of occurance based on the number of participants. Now, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I believe you will find Skylinerider's comment to be woefully overwrought.

2. Many people on this thread, including you two--by implication, at least--tell Miley that she is pandering to DOGM by quoting them and their provided information in her article. One even accuses her of irresponsible journalism. On the contrary, for the most part the article is well-enough researched, though deeper fact-finding couldn't hurt. Miley does not present what she states as factual, innarguable information. Rather she presents it as information given to her by a representative of DOGM, a "recognized" authority. Don't kill the messenger. Besides, were she to quote you without qualification, because you are not a "recognized" authority the story actually would be irresponsible. See #1.

Also, be wary of criticizing something you likely know little about (i.e. journalism).

Now, I'm kind of middle of the road on this particular issue. On one hand, I don't think access to most mines should be as restricted as it is. I think those located close to population centers should be controlled to prevent overexploration, but not completely restricted. On the other hand, some mines, especially those that are close to population centers and deemed extremely unsafe should be backfilled and capped to prevent those people who do need to be protected from themselves from going in and later having to be rescued.

After all, we don't need to save every mine ever dug as an archeological treasure. Just because it's old, doesn't mean it's valuable. If you disagree, I have a piece of granite I'd like to sell you.
« anonymous wrote on Wednesday, Aug 20 at 01:03 PM »
Sarah, Have you ever even seen a mine? Or does DOGM do all the thinking for you?
« cowboy logic wrote on Wednesday, Aug 20 at 05:52 AM »
Learn how to spell--its ADIT, not ardit... what what do you mean when you say they are guts that go straight down? A "gut" that goes stright down is a shaft if it reaches the surface and a winze if it starts and ends underground.
« kd7mxi wrote on Tuesday, Aug 19 at 01:38 PM »
IexploreMines!

the church does that also
« IexploreMines! wrote on Tuesday, Aug 19 at 07:46 AM »
It is amazing how the media always tries to make up our mind for us. Thank goodness there are some people who have had enough and think for themselves! Mines can be dangerous. As dangerous as you'd like them to be, but then again what isn't? Driving down the freeway I could easily kill myself and others with one careless lane change. It happens all the time. Walking in a mine I could fall down a shaft if I closed my eyes while I walked for long enough. People get THEMSELVES killed in mines. Mines don't kill people, people kill people.

At least 555 people -- including more than 100 children -- died in all-terrain vehicle accidents in 2006. (Desert News)

Tod McFarland and Stephanie McFarland were killed when their sport utility vehicle hit a median on Interstate 70. (North County Times, Sigurd, Utah)

Bill Corliss, 49, was killed March 25 while riding with a group of cyclists on a narrow state road south of Salt Lake City. (All Business, Park City, Utah)

Traffic accidents kill nearly 300 in Utah in 2007

(Ksl)

I think we all get the idea. There are a lot more dangerous things out there. Mining exploration should not be one we frown upon. People are going to get hurt and killed. It's just the natural order of life, yes it's terrible and sad but you can't change nature. The government needs to STOP trying to 'protect' us. If we can't be smart enough to 'protect' ourselves then I think natural section is best.

« TooeleCherokee wrote on Tuesday, Aug 19 at 05:15 AM »
How does one fill in a mine and yet "preserve" its history. How does one tear down old buildings at the head of a mine and call that preserving history?

I have been in the Honorine and seen where the kid fell down... kinda hard to miss a hole that big but I guess not everyone can pay attention.. Same goes for driving your ATV into a mine shaft. If you can't pay enough attention to what is around you then you really shouldn't be riding an ATV. Also failure to follow the current path or trail and go cross country doesn't make me feel bad for you..

Seriously Transcript do some research and don't just take a line of BS the DOGM gives you
« Skylinerider wrote on Monday, Aug 18 at 04:38 PM »
DOGM doesn't care about the safety of the people, they only care about getting the Federal funding in order to continue justifying what they are doing.
« Skylinerider wrote on Monday, Aug 18 at 02:43 PM »
great job on just spewing out what the DOGM gave you transcript. It's rediculuous that you even print this. Statistically, exploring abandoned mines is about the safest outdoor experience there is. You really do need to do a little fact finding before just putting out stuff the Govt gives you.
« Jaketheminer wrote on Monday, Aug 18 at 02:35 PM »
If you are alive don't let them fool you listen to mike09!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« emike09 wrote on Monday, Aug 18 at 02:30 PM »
I agree with mike09!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« emike09 wrote on Monday, Aug 18 at 02:24 PM »
This is crap! Walking outside is a bigger risk than exploring a hard rock mine that has been standing for more than 75 years. Look at the statistics. They weren't your average people either.A group of scouts, the one boy a totally insane. A kid whose mother hung out in all the bars and did who knows what.Stop something more dangerous and save millions of lives. You have a better chance of being a superstar than getting hurt or killed in a mine. Get the big picture!
« emike09 wrote on Monday, Aug 18 at 01:59 PM »
The DOGM claims filling these sites also helps preserve the history. They say that backfilling, it further protects the supporting structures inside. Yet mines are full of clean, dry air that prevents molding of structures and premature decay. Sealing off a mine stops this airflow, breaks down anything inside, and can result in a massive ground collapse on the surface.

I believe a compromise can be reached between the AMRP and those who view the closures of these sites differently, and we'd love to discuss them further with the DOGM, yet they refuse any direct communication with us except to satisfy their superiors whom we are in writing with. All parties, including the AMRP, site historians, spelunkers, and mineral gatherers can walk away happy and the DNR freed from liability.

Tens of thousands of explorers safely venture into these open abandoned mines each

year, with an average of .19 deaths and approximately 1 injury per year. Some individual sites in the west see over 10,000 visitors in a year with almost no safety incidents.

Who ever told the government it was their job to save us from ourselves?
« anonymous wrote on Monday, Aug 18 at 12:45 PM »
Perhaps the Transcript should actually do a little research into the claims of the DOGM before just printing what they give them. Actual research would yield the fact that these historical mines are not dangerous to those prepared and who use common sense. This article is irresponsible journalism.
« Gold_Rush_Expeditions wrote on Monday, Aug 18 at 12:42 PM »
Perhaps the Transcript should actually do a little research into the claims of the DOGM before just printing what they give them. Actual research would yield the fact that these historical mines are not dangerous to those prepared and who use common sense. This article is irresponsible journalism.
« Gold_Rush_Expeditions wrote on Monday, Aug 18 at 12:10 PM »
Jim Springer is full of it. This is the history of the state they are destroying and they are telling you ghost stories to get away with it. There are less than 5 documented deaths from mine accidents. You are more likely to get struck by lightning than be injured in a mine. Use common sense and you will be fine.

Jeremiah Etherington was swinging from rusted pipes when one broke and he fell to his death. - thats called Darwinism

Robert Thorpe - Should have watched the road.

There is no record I can find of the Gold Hill death.

And Joshua Dennis, really?? Skinner could have had him out in the first day, instead he had to sneak in to get the kid out.

None of these death or injuries are a result of "cave ins", "bad air" or "winzes", and there is no record of anyone suffocating in an abandoned mine.

That said, these arent abandoned, they are the property of individuals that DOGM bullies into giving up their rights to.

We are giving up our history, and our rights to another Government agency by listening to this.

www.goldrushexpeditions.com

www.mojaveunderground.com

Make a difference!
report abuse...

Comments will be posted after review. Please allow up to 24 hours for comment approval.

Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Tooele Transcript-Bulletin. Abusive comments and users are subject to rejection or removal without notification.

We will reject and remove comments that contain any of the following: Potentially libelous statements; personal attacks, insults or threats; profanity or obscene references; copyrighted articles or information used without permission; promotional messages of a commercial nature; links to other Web sites; comments unrelated to the topic of the article.

By posting a comment, you are agreeing to abide by these guidelines. Violation of these guidelines may result in a user being barred from posting on the Web site.