Human skull found in attic
by Natalie Tripp
Jun 24, 2008 | 4923 views | 38 38 comments | 38 38 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Image 1 of 2
Tooele County Medical Examiner Judd Erickson pulls a human skull from a Tooele home. The skull was discovered by construction workers re-roofing the home Monday afternoon.
-- photography / Troy Boman
A human skull was discovered in the attic of a Tooele home Monday afternoon by contractors remodeling the roof.

Paul and Karen Dupaix had hired Superior Exterior to tear down and rebuild the roof of their 100 South Street home, which is almost 100 years old. But as the construction crew was pulling off shingles around 4 p.m., one of the workers noticed the skull through the slats underneath.

“I pulled back the bottom layer of shingles and I saw what looked like the top of a head,” said Fausto Hernandes, the contractor who discovered the skull. “I was really nervous as I started to peel off the other shingles, and then I saw the whole thing.”

The construction crew quickly notified the Dupaixs of the discovery and the family called police.“The skull is several years old and is quite decomposed,” said Tooele City Police Lt. Jorge Cholico. “We may bring in cadaver dogs and other resources to help us. We don’t know where the rest of the body is. There is quite a bit left uncovered in this situation.”

The Tooele County Medical Examiner removed the skull from the roof Monday evening for further examination and testing that will result in information such as the age of the skull. Forensic investigators hope to have more information by Thursday, although that timeframe may have to be extended somewhat, according to Tooele City Police Capt. Steve Newkirk.

Remodeling work on the house was stopped and the construction crew was dismissed after making the discovery.

The Dupaixs’ house was built in 1910 on land owned by Peter Droubay. It is unclear whether or not Droubay himself lived in the house, but according to the Tooele County Recorder’s Office, the house was purchased by a chiropractor named Heber J. McKay in 1928. McKay turned the house over to the Home Owners Loan Corporation in 1936 and it was purchased the same year by Rex and Helen Stutzneggar. The couple raised their family in the home for 64 years until the Dupaixs purchased it in 2000.

The skull was found resting between the attic ceiling and some storage cabinets that lined the attic wall. The roof had been re-shingled by a previous owner and there were two layers of shingles covering the skull’s resting place, according to Paul.

The discovery shook the Dupaix family and their seven children.

“How can you describe something like that?” said Dupaix. “I was shocked. That was in my attic. That was under my shingles.”

The roof was being repaired in order to put the house up for sale, according to Paul. That process will now be on hold while the investigation continues.

The family was not allowed to stay in the home Monday evening as the investigation proceeded. They spent the night at their LDS bishop’s house, but were allowed to return home Tuesday.

ntripp@tooeletranscript.com
comments (38)
« Bennett Blake wrote on Friday, Jun 27 at 07:19 AM »
Possibly a WWII trophy. Many skulls were brought home and after some time the owners eventually buried them.

Hey, we're Celts to the bone...
« ugly wrote on Thursday, Jun 26 at 07:33 AM »
Lost: 1 head, missing teeth and lower jaw, some skin missing, with extensive balding, last seen on my body several years ago in the attic down the road from the bishops house. If found please call Nat Tripp or Mudpie, ask for bubba55.
« stirthepot wrote on Thursday, Jun 26 at 07:23 AM »
Titelist5, LMAO! What type of bishop? what room number?, did you hold the onions?, are sure it wasn't the D news gone liberal?, Catholics have friends? Journalist?

In Utah you don't need to learn to spell or write to be a journalist, just need a temple recommend and a promise to put a LDS angle on your all stories.

YA bubba, I love ya man!

« Titelist5 wrote on Thursday, Jun 26 at 06:55 AM »
The only thing more interesting than the article was the commentary on it.... It was an article about someone losing their head, and was followed up with commentary from people doing the same. By the way, I wrote this comment from my bishops room in the Best Western in Tooele(not Grantsville)while eating a hamberger from McDonalds ( sorry Wendy's!)while reading The TRANSCRIPT ( sorry Tribune )with a bunch of Catholic friends surrounding me... ( ya know, that really felt good!!) I think I will be journalist... Got two lern two spel phirst!
« dirtmuffin wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 07:23 PM »
Ay baby I told you not ta rite on the inernet nomore!
« muddpie wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 07:18 PM »
touche mr bubba
« mrbubba55 wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 07:11 PM »
well all in all, after all the heated debate and idiot discussion. I think Natalie did a great job on this article. Very well written and entertaining.
« stirthepot wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 04:44 PM »
bobalouie, Now was funny! good job.

I will go to the classified section under lost and found and see if anyone is missing a head.

« stirthepot wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 04:20 PM »
Thank You Ms.Tripp, I think some people were worried about you uh...getting your feelings hurt. lol

« Bobalouie wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 04:14 PM »
The story was about a skull found in the roof of an old house that was being remodeled, the comments were way off track. Will be interesting to find out who lost their head, not whom the Dupaix family stayed with overnight.
« Natalie Tripp wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 04:05 PM »
Oh no, actually I find it quite entertaining to read through while at work.
« stirthepot wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 03:01 PM »
Mr bubba, That was good! bada bing bada boom

thats the spirit.

Thanks TTB online, for new comment section It will be a blast! if not taken to heart.

I'm sure Ms. Tripp understands it is part of the territory, and will not loose any sleep.
« barking rabbit wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 02:55 PM »
stirthepot, You are a regular comedian, A real funny guy! Why don't you stick a flower in your lapel and squirt water on bubba55

« mrbubba55 wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 02:54 PM »
DugwayRes,

I wasn't fighting over what religion it was, I was making a point to Stirthepot, He was the one commenting on religion, and I showed how idiotic it was.

Apparently I'm mad. No, I'm annoyed at how people get touchy over religion. I'm actually quite happy. I was laughing with Tripp on how she was getting torn apart now that people can comment on the website. So I figured I'd stick up for her and show my opinion.

Now thank you Mr. Stirthepot for teaching me this valuable lesson (sarcasm). I don't think I need you to be my teacher. Maybe you can put me in anger management. (that was sarcasm)
« stirthepot wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 02:37 PM »
Like I said, Tripp, I owe you one, I used you, your report, and sarcasm to prove how angry people get over petty issues, whether it is a good thing or a bad thing, I quess we will see.
« DugwayRes wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 02:36 PM »
Dear Mr Bubba55, Calm down. Its not a big deal. Its just an interesting article. It doesn't matter what religion it is, was or might be. Who cares???? I just wanna know did they have any kind of paranormal experiences. Now, THATS interesting.
« Karen Dupaix wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 02:27 PM »
Hi, I usually don't like to read comments because they can get pretty crazy.

When Natalie asked us where we stayed, it was just easier to say with our bishop than to say with our good friends who live around the corner and invited us to stay with them if we needed to because they're those kind of people. Perhaps she put in the LDS because she didn't want it confused with another religion?

our friends were most generous. We had to vacate our home without the privilege of going inside for personal effects or even our house keys! Our cars were also not allowed off the premises because they were behind the crime scene tapes. What wonderful friends (and coincidentally, our bishop and his wife) we have to take a family of 9 in like that on such short notice!

I thought Natalie did a superb job covering the story. We were very impressed.
« stirthepot wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 02:24 PM »
Mrbubba, Are you sure you are not angry? I Did not mean to offend you or anyone else, if I did I apologize. I was trying to see if anyone could tell us what responsible journalism is (reporting the substantiated facts to the public domain with out interference of government, religion and corruption) with out personally attacking my opinion(which was a hoax) Why you did not see it coming is really quite ironic huh? As to the answer your question about sarcasm. See # 3 previously on what I learned in post school today.

You are killing me with your unsubstantiated fact that religious people bother me. Is it possible I have you all wrong? or vise verse?
« OhBrother! wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 02:20 PM »
Really, "Tripp's" story was well written. The coverage of the story was exactly what it needed to be. We got the facts, didn't we?? Putting in a line about religion probably wasn't the best idea but I don't think her story needs to be assassinated over it. I stand by mrbubba55 in saying that the sarcasm was a bit much and a bit muddled. Lets give the poor girl a break, shall we?
« mrbubba55 wrote on Wednesday, Jun 25 at 02:00 PM »
OH, I get it. what I didnt get so much was what was sarcastic and what wasn't.
report abuse...

Comments will be posted after review. Please allow up to 24 hours for comment approval.

Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Tooele Transcript-Bulletin. Abusive comments and users are subject to rejection or removal without notification.

We will reject and remove comments that contain any of the following: Potentially libelous statements; personal attacks, insults or threats; profanity or obscene references; copyrighted articles or information used without permission; promotional messages of a commercial nature; links to other Web sites; comments unrelated to the topic of the article.

By posting a comment, you are agreeing to abide by these guidelines. Violation of these guidelines may result in a user being barred from posting on the Web site.